Language for taxonomic names, redux
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Wed Feb 22 18:32:55 CET 2017
On 22 February 2017 at 14:30, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com> wrote:
> On 22 Feb 2017, at 11:18, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>> I've set out several additional use-cases previously, including:
>> * Selection for styling by CSS
> Styling? Just italic, right?
No. Taxonomic names /should/ be styled using italics. But an
individual publisher (or an individual reader, using a local CSS)
might choose to have them in, say red text on a yellow background.
>>> but the thing is so very few of these names would be found in an ordinary dictionary in any language that I don’t know how likely it is that this error occurs
>> The number of identified species was estimated, in or before 2011, as "between 1.4 and 1.8 million". The full number may be 100 million or higher. That's a lot of words, many of which (such as the genus "Circus" or the epithets "bicolor", "major" and "minor") have
>> (another) meaning in one or more languages.
> That’s not a half-dozen terms.
My examples were intended to be illustrate, not quantitative. There
are, though, well over a dozen species in the genus Circus:
and over 350 species using the epithet "minor":
> Might there be hundreds of such words? Thousands? >
> I doubt that English, French, German, or Japanese users pronounce “Eurema desjardinsii” in the same way.
Perhaps not; but they arguably should. And any difference is likely to
be down to accent, not language. I (a monolingual Englishman) have
been able to indicate birds and plants to a monolingual German, and
vice versa, using taxonomic names.
>> -taxon would satisfy that requirement, and its meaning should be clear and understandable internationally.
> I would judge that to be too obscure; “taxonomy” can refer to many schemes. Some other terms for this
> nomenclature are “binomen”, and “binomial name”, “binomial nomenclature”, “scientific name”, “Latin name”.
> As I said, I think -linnaeus would be much clearer.
"taxon" is not the same word as "taxonomy". The former has a
distinct, specific, and internationally recognised meaning. Neither
“binomen”, and “binomial name” apply to higher ranks such as genus,
family or order. “Latin name” is colloquial, but is not formally
More information about the Ietf-languages