Latin Variants

Arthur Reutenauer arthur.reutenauer at
Fri Mar 11 13:05:35 CET 2016

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 03:57:57PM +0000, Michael Everson wrote:
> As a publisher of Latin I would be interested in options for i/j/u/v but the scheme you propose doesn’t seem to take this into account, being defined by period (which is problematic) rather than by orthography. 

  I'm willing to submit registration forms for that.  According to your
observations, that coincide with mine, there are three different common

> 1. Use of i for /i, j/ and u for /u, v/ throughout.
> 2. Use of i for /i, j/ and u for /u/ and v for /v/.
> 3. Use of i for /i/ and j for /j/ and u for /u/ and v for /v/.

  What subtags should we use for them?  I really have no idea.



More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list