Another attempt at plain language
Mark Davis ☕️
mark at macchiato.com
Fri Sep 4 18:05:42 CEST 2015
It is pretty open-ended, by design. There is only one subtag currently,
POSIX, for tagging entities like "en-u-va-posix".
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:
> Mark Davis 🍾 wrote:
> > However, if it ends up not being added as a BCP47 variant, one could
> > file a ticket for consideration as a BCP47 locale variant. The syntax
> > would be a bit different, eg en-u-va-plain vs en-plain.
> To clarify, this would be an extension-U subtag in accordance with RFC
> I'm confused how "plain English" (or German or what have you) represents
> any sort of aspect of a locale. Is "special variant" that open-ended?
> Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages