Mark Davis ☕️
mark at macchiato.com
Wed Nov 25 20:50:01 CET 2015
I disagree with "basiceng". What people need is a variant to indicate a
simplified version of a language. That is not satisfied by "Basic English",
which nobody has a demonstrated need for.
What should be added is:
Description: Simple version of the language in question. For example,
"en-basic" is a simple form of English.
If there is a demonstrated need for simultaneous use of particular versions
of this (which we haven't seen yet), those can be added as *refining*
variants, eg "en-simple-wikipedi"
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that there was consensus to add these two
> subtags proposed by Michael, which garnered no feedback except
> and NO consensus yet to add this one, which generated 24 responses and
> then sort of fizzled:
> Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages