No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?

[cowan at ccil.org]

Mark Davis scripsit:

> I would rather take any of the suggestions so far (even "oxendict") rather
> than leave it as is, where it is (to us) useless.

By "us" you mean Google, and it is useless to you only because you have
arbitrarily decided not to support any irregular tags.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan at ccil.org
I now introduce Professor Smullyan, who will prove to you that either
he doesn't exist or you don't exist, but you won't know which.