Revised records and registration forms for Portuguese variants

[Andrew Glass (WINDOWS)]

I see that could be confusing. The intent here was to indicate that this set of conventions was not ratified in Brazil, which continued to follow the 1943 conventions. It would be better to rephrase that.

Comments: Portuguese orthography conventions established in 1945, generally in effect until 2009. This reform was not ratified in Brazil.

I'm not in a position to say whether anyone ever created content in Brazil using the 1945 orthography.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ietf-languages [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Doug Ewell
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:19 AM
To: Phillips, Addison; ietf-languages
Subject: RE: Revised records and registration forms for Portuguese variants

I didn't understand that either. It was, after all, a "Luso-Brasileira"
convention. Maybe Andrew, who wrote the comment for the original request when it was 'ao1945', can explain.

--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸

 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Revised records and registration forms for Portuguese variants
From: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at lab126.com>
Date: Fri, March 27, 2015 11:13 am
To: Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org>, ietf-languages <ietf-languages at iana.org>

> Type: variant
> Subtag: colb1945
...
> Comments: Portuguese orthography conventions established in 1945, 
> generally in effect until 2009, except in Brazil

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages