Add Likely Subtags first step
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Sun Jan 25 19:12:02 CET 2015
Doug Ewell scripsit:
> • adding variant 'oxford' with prefix "en" and deprecating
> "en-GB-oed". I don't prefer something cryptic like 'oxendict' if
> 'oxford' is acceptable to all.
I prefer 'oxendict'.
> • adding variant 'idefault' with prefix "en" and deprecating
> "i-default". This subtag value is better than 'default' (which I
> originally would have preferred) as the latter would have been
I am unalterably opposed to this. RFC 5255 (IMAP extensions) uses i-default,
and isn't going to change, and probably no one else does. Adding en-idefault
> • adding variant 'enochian' with prefix "art" and deprecating
> "i-enochian". (If you insist, that is. I'm still not sure what "not
> important enough" means.)
Historically it meant "has a literature", which entails "used by someone
other than the creator". I don't think Enochian qualifies.
> • adding variant 'mingo' with prefix 'see' and deprecating "i-mingo".
> • deprecating "cel-gaulish" and adding a "see ..." Comments field
> with subtags alphabetized.
As noted, I'd prefer to omit the tags unless we can get authoritative
information on which they should be.
> • adding a "see ..." Comments field to the already-deprecated
> "zh-min" (with subtags alphabetized), and hoping that will be the
> end of digital ink spilled over this ill-conceived tag.
Though when zh-min was assigned, the split of Min Chinese into four or
five varieties was not yet contemplated. Min is essentially a subfamily
of Sinitic that split off from the rest of Sinitic before the Middle
Chinese period. "Ill-conceived" is rather harsh.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
He that would foil me must use such weapons as I do, for I have not
fed my readers with straw, neither will I be confuted with stubble.
--Thomas Vaughan (1650)
More information about the Ietf-languages