Review periods

Peter Constable petercon at
Fri Apr 17 17:43:00 CEST 2015

OK; it wasn't clear to me that that was the formal end of that topic. Thanks for clarifying.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ietf-languages [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 7:11 AM
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion
Subject: Re: Review periods

On 17 Apr 2015, at 07:59, Peter Constable <petercon at> wrote:

> That's why I consider it a pre-requisite. I'd still expect an explicit statement to eliminate any ambiguity, however. In any formal process, substantive decisions should never be left to inference.

But Peter, I closed that debate when I said it was to be oxendict. 

Michael Everson *

Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list