Review periods

[Peter Constable]

OK; it wasn't clear to me that that was the formal end of that topic. Thanks for clarifying.


Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Ietf-languages [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 7:11 AM
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion
Subject: Re: Review periods

On 17 Apr 2015, at 07:59, Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com> wrote:

> That's why I consider it a pre-requisite. I'd still expect an explicit statement to eliminate any ambiguity, however. In any formal process, substantive decisions should never be left to inference.

But Peter, I closed that debate when I said it was to be oxendict. 

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages