Docket

[Doug Ewell]

OK, so the Prefix should be "en" and not "en-GB".

What should be the Preferred-Value for the deprecated tag "en-GB-oed"? Should it be "en-oxendict" or "en-GB-oxendict"?

--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸

-----Original Message-----
From: "Michael Everson" <everson at evertype.com>
Sent: ‎4/‎9/‎2015 17:14
To: "Peter Constable" <petercon at microsoft.com>
Cc: "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>; "ietflang IETF Languages Discussion" <ietf-languages at iana.org>
Subject: Re: Docket

On 9 Apr 2015, at 07:03, Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com> wrote:

> 1. Add 'oxendict' and deprecate "en-GB-oed"
> 
> Forms posted to the list March 27; review period ends this Friday, April 10.
> 
> Note that the current proposal shows "en-oxendict" as the Preferred-Value for "en-GB-oed", removing the 'GB' component. Is this desirable, or should the P-V be "en-GB-oxendict"? I don't think we necessarily want the Prefix for 'oxendict' to be "en-GB" since non-British English usage could still employ OED spellings.

I employ OED spellings but am not a speaker of British English. And the spelling can certainly be used in IE.  

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20150409/cdbd98d8/attachment-0001.html>