No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?

Mark Davis ☕️ mark at
Wed Apr 1 08:15:04 CEST 2015

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:34 PM, <cowan at> wrote:

> By "us" you mean Google, and it is useless to you only because you have
arbitrarily decided not to support any irregular tags.

​No, I mean Unicode (CLDR). And our decision was not "arbitrary".

Any more conclusions you want to jump to, as long as you are at it?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list