No consensus on en-GB-oed replacement?

[Mark Davis ☕️]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:34 PM, <cowan at ccil.org> wrote:

> By "us" you mean Google, and it is useless to you only because you have
>
arbitrarily decided not to support any irregular tags.
>

​No, I mean Unicode (CLDR). And our decision was not "arbitrary".

Any more conclusions you want to jump to, as long as you are at it?

Mark
<https://google.com/+MarkDavis>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20150401/c1d99ef0/attachment.html>