Assignment of private use language subtags
anthony at aristar.org
Sun May 11 07:05:45 CEST 2014
No problem, Doug! It's not at all obvious on the site. Yours was a natural assumption.
> On May 10, 2014, at 3:27 PM, "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:
> Anthony Aristar <anthony at aristar dot org> wrote:
>> 1. The fact that MultiTree uses a local use code should not be taken
>> as evidence that the MultiTree project believes that the language
>> exists. The system it uses requires that every language entered into
>> its system have a unique 3-character code, and since the project is
>> designed to collect all hypotheses proposed about language
>> relationships, even those which are wrong, it sometimes assigns a code
>> to a language that does not and has never existed.
> Thank you for providing that background. I certainly would not have blithely written "The quality of the list is debatable" if I had known that.
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA
> http://ewellic.org | @DougEwell
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
More information about the Ietf-languages