Updated record for 'u' in Extensions Registry

Doug Ewell doug at ewellic.org
Tue Mar 25 19:56:21 CET 2014

This is a last call to see whether the maintaining authority for BCP 47
has any plans to correct the entry for extension 'u' in the Language Tag
Extensions Registry that contains an overlong line.

I've written privately about this twice, with no reply.

If there is no correction, I'll drop the matter and assume I'm the only
one interested in whether this registry adheres to the ABNF called out
in Section 3.1.1.

Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA
http://ewellic.org | @DougEwell

-------- Original Message --------
On Mon Jan 13 07:50:07 CET 2014,
"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it dot aoyama dot ac dot jp> wrote:

> As the shepherd for RFC 6067 (see
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6067/writeup/), I thought I'd make
> you aware of the issue below. Please send a message to IANA
> <iana at iana.org> with the update record below (removing the
> quotations) and the explanation that this is done because it was found
> that one of the lines is longer than allowed.

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list