everson at evertype.com
Sun Sep 15 08:14:59 CEST 2013
On 14 Sep 2013, at 23:06, Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14 at telia.com> wrote:
> Is your (apparent) support for this variant subtag to be interpreted as that you have given up the idea of encoding Unifon as a script separate from the Latin script? (Cmp. http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/n4195.pdf.)
That document offers options. Discussion with the UTC suggested that Latin variant was the better option.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
More information about the Ietf-languages