Early Modern English
everson at evertype.com
Thu Jan 12 18:23:26 CET 2012
On 12 Jan 2012, at 16:40, John Cowan wrote:
>> I'm not much tempted by "en-emode" as a tag. Cawdry or another
>> description would be more interesting.
> Cawdrey's work is a glossary, as Doug noted. And your "interesting" is my "obscure".
Fine. I think "emode" is a bad subtag. It looks like "e-mode". It is redundant in that its final -e is captured in en-emode.
Doug, please look at the precedent we used for early French. Thank you.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
More information about the Ietf-languages