gender voice variants
John Cowan
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Sat Dec 22 01:14:42 CET 2012
Michael Everson scripsit:
> I'm pretty sure our variants are mostly orthographical and do not deal
> with word-choice-type content.
Mostly, but there are plenty of exceptions: aluku, arevela, arevmda,
biscayan, biske, emodeng, itihasa, ... In addition, boont and jauer
are specifically about spoken varieties without a standard written form.
> > Looking over the subtag registry, I find the distinctions represented
> > there are: like the speaker's or writer's point of origin, the
> > period of use, the writer's spelling conventions, and the use of
> > unusual terminology.
>
> All of those are subsumed under "identifiable orthography".
Most or all may be *orthographically identifiable* (that is, you can tell
whether something is en-boont or not by looking at a transcription),
but that does not make them purely orthographic variants.
> > (Indeed, when this discussion dies down, I think we should next look
> > at formality levels, if only on an oversimplified formal/informal
> > basis, with additional details (if needed for, say, Javanese) left
> > for language-specific subtags.)
>
> Because it's good to make work for ourselves? I recall you grousing
> at me for wanting to be completist at times. ;-)
I agree, but apparently the subtags are already being used, and I think
we should bless them on the same grounds as the ones now proposed
(the set of four, that is).
> This does not respond to my suggestion that such distinctions might
> be best left to other tagging levels, such as <speaker> or <audience>.
What can I say? It seems to me to fit with the others. There simply
is no precise definition of what should be represented using a variant
tag and what should not. Your Majesty's subjects have petitioned for
these subtags, and I believe they should be given them.
> But they have children's voices, not adults' voices. I can choose
> the language of my software interface and I can choose the voice it
> speaks to me in.
Fair enough. If there's a demand for this too, then let it be granted,
but so far I think there is not.
--
John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist er nicht.
--Albert Einstein
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list