gender voice variants
yury.tarasievich at gmail.com
Thu Dec 20 07:16:17 CET 2012
For East Slavic languages, the 'neutral' subtag
is completely spurious, and masc./fem. subtags
are strongly artificial, introduced by
unwarranted extension of analogy.
I gave some factography to Peter Constable and
Milos Rancic just now, so won't auto-repeat.
How might the family of languages be *excluded*
from such subtagging? Must I submit an amendment
proposal or something?
On 12/20/2012 01:48 AM, Doug Ewell wrote:
> Peter Constable wrote:
>> ... it may be that a variant subtag for
>> 'neutral' (assuming we
>> conclude that it's a good thing to capture
>> gender distinctions in
>> variant subtags in the first place) might not
>> be needed: it may be
>> sufficient to reflect that by the absence of
>> any male/female variant
> That would be consistent with similar decisions
> made here in the past.
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA
> http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
More information about the Ietf-languages