pseudo-localization variants

Mark Davis ☕ mark at macchiato.com
Tue Dec 18 22:17:26 CET 2012


We anticipated that reaction, and thus were looking at extension tags from
CLDR instead.


Mark <https://plus.google.com/114199149796022210033>
*
*
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
**



On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com>wrote:

> You have und, mis, and zxx available. You're tagging the language content,
> not the usage scenario. if the text isn't in a real language, then it
> should be Undetermined, Uncoded, no have no real Linguistic Content.
>
> I doubt we'd want a code for glossolalia either apart from und, mis, or
> zxx.
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20121218/fcfa6dd7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list