proposed ISO 639 change for "arn"

John Cowan cowan at
Fri Dec 14 19:40:30 CET 2012

Doug Ewell scripsit:

> Most importantly, though, it's the *right thing to do* in this
> situation. If the real requirement is to change a code element, change
> the code element.

I agree absolutely (I would say "+1", but I know that triggers His Majesty's
innumeracy reflexes).

John Cowan    cowan at
Nobody expects the RESTifarian Inquisition!  Our chief weapon is
surprise ... surprise and tedium  ... tedium and surprise ....
Our two weapons are tedium and surprise ... and ruthless disregard
for unpleasant facts....  Our three weapons are tedium, surprise, and
ruthless disregard ... and an almost fanatical devotion to Roy Fielding....

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list