Review period; Nepali and Oriya
doug at ewellic.org
Sat Aug 11 17:17:08 CEST 2012
Gordon P. Hemsley wrote:
> Just to clarify: These records will have "Scope: macrolanguage",
> right? And the descriptions will be changed to include
Yes, I was using quick excerpts from the current Registry to show each
record that would get a Comments field. See my "Updated" post from July
for the actual records and registration forms that would be modified.
> As for the comments, you are only mentioning the subtag that was
> formerly represented by this subtag, but not the one which now
> represents the individual language?
I had thought that people might need the cross-reference to the minority
language more than to the dominant language, but I don't know why I
Maybe adding Comments fields to macrolanguages that don't have extlangs
is a bad idea and a slippery slope. We've never done it before, and they
could start to be viewed by some as "required" Comments fields, which
they aren't (we've had this problem before). Let's not do this. We can
always add comments later if desired.
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA
http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell
More information about the Ietf-languages