Request to register private-use variant subtags
cewcathar at hotmail.com
Sat Apr 7 04:57:36 CEST 2012
Sorry for the delay in my response.
The codes reserved for private use for language, Script, region vary slightly:
qaa - qtz: language
Qaaa - Qabx: script
QM-QZ (also AA, XA-XZ): region
Thus I do not know whether qxaaa - qx999999 would be the most appropriate choices.
doug at ewellic.org
Sat Mar 31 01:51:14 CEST 2012
> I don't support this, and I believe the registration of a new 'begin..end' private-use block would require a revision of BCP 47.
I tend to concur with Doug, that rather than registering the whole set of gxaaa - qx999999 variant codes, one would need to redo RFC 5646, and include the information about the new reserved codes in that document.
I am unsure as to whether a variant like qxqxqxqx or qzqzqzqz could be registered for this purpose.
The information from RFC 5646, starting with the second bullet, seems to say "no:"
" o Dialect or other divisions or variations within a language, its
orthography, writing system, regional or historical usage,
transliteration or other transformation, or distinguishing
variation MAY be registered as variant subtags. An example is the
'rozaj' subtag (the Resian dialect of Slovenian).
" o The addition or maintenance of fields (generally of an
informational nature) in tag or subtag records as described in
Section 3.1 is allowed. Such changes are subject to the stability
provisions in Section 3.4. This includes 'Description',
'Comments', 'Deprecated', and 'Preferred-Value' fields for
obsolete or withdrawn codes, or the addition of 'Suppress-Script'
or 'Macrolanguage' fields to primary language subtags, as well as
other changes permitted by this document, such as the addition of
an appropriate 'Prefix' field to a variant subtag.
" o The addition of records and related field value changes necessary
to reflect assignments made by ISO 639, ISO 15924, ISO 3166-1, and
UN M.49 as described in Section 3.4 is allowed."
" This document leaves the decision on what subtags or changes to
subtags are appropriate (or not) to the registration process
described in Section 3.5."
--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
> Addison is correct: the only use case for this appears to be to solve a transitory programming problem. The -x- mechanism exists to solve the problem of encoding language variations that don't have a registered subtag.
> Private-use language, script, and region subtags (like 'qaa') weren't invented by or for BCP 47; they exist in the core standards (ISO 639, 3166, 15924) for applications that can't use the BCP 47 -x- mechanism.
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA
> http://www.ewellic.org | @DougEwell
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T\
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages