Tagging transliterations from a specific script

[Michael Everson]

I can't see the problem.

On 14 Mar 2011, at 17:19, Doug Ewell wrote:

> * Tatar, transliterated from original Arabic into Latin
> * Tatar, transliterated from original Cyrillic into Latin

tt-Arab is Tatar language written in Arabic script

tt-Cyrl is Tatar language written in Cyrillic script 

tt-Arab-alalc92 is Tatar language written in Arabic script and then transliterated into Latin using that specification

tt-Cyrl-alalc92 is Tatar language written in Cyrillic script and then transliterated into Latin using that specification 

What is wrong with that? The use of -alalc92 in those contexts couldn't mean anything else. 

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/