"Martin J. Dürst"
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Thu Jul 21 12:14:26 CEST 2011
On 2011/07/08 6:00, Doug Ewell wrote:
> Pete Resnick<presnick at qualcomm dot com> wrote:
> I'm concerned that all of the procedures for assigning field values
> adopted in RFC 6067 are being taken as a precedent for this draft as
> well. The assignments are solely up to the CLDR committee, and there is
> no public announcement or notification that a change has been made or
> why a request was rejected. It could be argued that the -u- mechanism
> was really only meant for CLDR-type usage; no such argument can be made
> for the -t- mechanism.
I agree with Doug.
> I can't find any indication of where within CLDR the list of allowable
> values will be located. Saying they're in core.zip is almost useless.
> Saying they're in common/bcp47 is better, but I'd still like to know
> what file name, what XML element, etc. An example would help.
Agreed here again.
More information about the Ietf-languages