[Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext

["Martin J. Dürst"]

On 2011/07/08 6:00, Doug Ewell wrote:
> Pete Resnick<presnick at qualcomm dot com>  wrote:

> I'm concerned that all of the procedures for assigning field values
> adopted in RFC 6067 are being taken as a precedent for this draft as
> well.  The assignments are solely up to the CLDR committee, and there is
> no public announcement or notification that a change has been made or
> why a request was rejected.  It could be argued that the -u- mechanism
> was really only meant for CLDR-type usage; no such argument can be made
> for the -t- mechanism.

I agree with Doug.

> I can't find any indication of where within CLDR the list of allowable
> values will be located.  Saying they're in core.zip is almost useless.
> Saying they're in common/bcp47 is better, but I'd still like to know
> what file name, what XML element, etc.  An example would help.

Agreed here again.

Regards,   Martin.