petercon at microsoft.com
Sat Jul 9 09:34:35 CEST 2011
I think this needs more discussion. In particular, I think there are speech scenarios that may have requirements similar to some transcription / transliteration scenarios, and that that should be considered before a proposal that covers only transcription and transliteration scenarios gets progressed.
From: Pete Resnick [mailto:presnick at qualcomm.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 1:23 PM
To: Peter Constable
Cc: ltru at ietf.org; ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext
On 7/7/11 10:29 AM, Peter Constable wrote:
I was not aware of the discussion on LTRU. When will it be reviewed by IESG? What is the action being requested of IESG / what’s the status of this draft?
It is intended to be published as an AD-sponsored individual submission and is currently marked as going for "Informational". I'm the AD on the hook. We may revisit the question of status later.
Publication of this document was requested and we decided that it needed to get some review on ltru and ietf-languages. As soon as the authors feel like they've gotten solid community review, I'll start the process of reviewing the document and bringing it through the IESG process.
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/><http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages