Language subtag registration for ao1990

[João Miguel Neves]

Thanks. I don't know what makes a good prefix for the subtag. Could you
please explain why acor1990 is better than ao1990?

Thanks in advance,
João Miguel Neves

PS: unfortunately the opinion on the agreement is irrelevant for me, as
I still have to manage both pre and post agreement until 2015.

Em 21-08-2011 22:51, Michael Everson escreveu:
> Well, I have an extremely negative opinion about this "accord" which does nothing whatsoever good for European Portuguese. And I know it is controversial.
>
> acor1990 would be better than ao1990.
>
> On 21 Aug 2011, at 22:27, João Miguel Neves wrote:
>
>> LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM
>> 1. Name of requester: João Miguel Neves
>> 2. E-mail address of requester: joao at silvaneves.org
>> 3. Record Requested:
>>
>>    Type: variant
>>    Subtag: ao1990
>>    Description: 1990's agreement on Portuguese ortography
>>    Prefix: pt
>>    Comments: Portuguese orthography as defined by an international
>>      agreement signed in 1990 and implemented from 2009
>>
>> 4. Intended meaning of the subtag:
>>
>> This variant subtag is intended to apply to text that uses the modern
>> Portuguese orthography introduced in an international agreement signed
>> in 1990 and implemented from 2009.
>>
>> 5. Reference to published description
>>    of the language (book or article):
>>
>> The full text of the Agreement (Acordo Ortográfico da Língua
>> Portuguesa (1990)) as part of the Portuguese Parliament Resolution
>> nº 26/91: http://dre.pt/pdf1sdip/1991/08/193A00/43704388.pdf
>>
>> 6. Any other relevant information:
>>
>> The resolution referenced above lays out the differences between the
>> previous orthography and the modern denoted by the present subtag.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf-languages mailing list
>> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>