Wolof suppress script
petercon at microsoft.com
Sun Sep 19 07:50:54 CEST 2010
No comments? Perhaps a proposed change will evoke some comments:
LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM
1. Name of requester: Peter Constable
2. E-mail address of requester: petercon at microsoft.com
3. Record Requested:
Comments: orthographies in Latin and Arabic scripts
4. Intended meaning of the subtag: Wolof
5. Reference to published description
of the language (book or article):
DPLN Senegal. ca 2002. Tableau Général des Alphabets - Arabe/Langues Nationales en Caractères Coraniques
Harmonisés et leurs Correspondants en Caractères Latins. Direction de la Promotion des Langues
Nationales (DPLN). 23, Rue Calmette. Dakar.
6. Any other relevant information: When the subtag registry was initialized, the record was added with a suppress-script field set to Latn. However, there is an Arabic-script orthography for Wolof, in addition to a Latin orthography. Since a suppress-script is intended to be used in cases in which a single script is used "to write the overwhelming majority of documents for the given language", it is inappropriate for this field to be used for Wolof.
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Peter Constable
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 6:38 AM
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion (ietf-languages at iana.org)
Subject: Wolof suppress script
The record for Wolof as a suppress-script field:
But Wolof is written in both Latin and Arabic, and in fact a department under the Senegal Ministry of Education<http://www.education.gouv.sn/administration/directions.html>, Direction d'alphabetisation et les langues nationales, has published a teaching manual for Wolof in Arabic script and has standardized the Arabic-script orthography for Wolof. (This is not exclusive of standardized Latin orthography for Wolof.) Are we sure the suppress-script field is appropriate in this case?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages