Variant subtag request: iso91995

"Martin J. Dürst" duerst at
Thu Sep 16 02:43:23 CEST 2010

On 2010/09/16 0:39, Phillips, Addison wrote:

>> I don't have a solution, but I hope we can do better than
>> 'iso91995'.
> That's a really ugly subtag. However, it would work and is valid. Perhaps "1995iso9"?

9iso1995 seems more logical, but then probably there's some other catch 
with it.

Regards,   Martin.

#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#   mailto:duerst at

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list