Proposed new variant subtag: pre1917

[Doug Ewell]

Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> wrote:

> I favour luna1918 as it conforms to precedent.

I don't know that there's a clear precedent either way.  We have
'1606nict' and '1694acad' and '1959acad' on one hand, and 'alalc97'
and 'baku1926' on the other hand.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s ­