suppress-script values for fil, mi, pes, prs, qu members
Doug Ewell
doug at ewellic.org
Wed Oct 20 22:31:28 CEST 2010
Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote:
> Well, the door has always been open for people to propose additional
> s-s info. I'm not really worried that someone will come along
> proposing thousands of additions because there are just too many
> languages for which it's too hard to find info. I could imagine this
> leading over some time to dozens or maybe one- or two-hundred more
> cases that are assumed to be clear mono-script cases. And I'm not
> concerned that would be onerous were it to happen.
Well, we've already had cases in the past where requests to add S-S to
existing subtags were either rejected or caused lengthy debate on
philosophical grounds.
> Of course, we could also decide up front that we want to take some
> entirely different approach. That's why I opened general discussion
> rather than going directly to submitting forms.
And I do appreciate your taking that approach.
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list