suppress-script values for fil, mi, pes, prs, qu members

[Philip Newton]

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:15, Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com> wrote:
> And that's all I'm suggesting, really: that there are some additional cases for which s-s makes sense and, having identified them, that we document them.

Thank you for the background explanation.

I withdraw my reservations about adding an s-s field to language tags;
they were based on an incomplete understanding (on my part) of the
usage, purpose, and history of the field.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton <philip.newton at gmail.com>