suppress-script values for fil, mi, pes, prs, qu members
philip.newton at gmail.com
Wed Oct 20 10:15:12 CEST 2010
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:15, Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com> wrote:
> And that's all I'm suggesting, really: that there are some additional cases for which s-s makes sense and, having identified them, that we document them.
Thank you for the background explanation.
I withdraw my reservations about adding an s-s field to language tags;
they were based on an incomplete understanding (on my part) of the
usage, purpose, and history of the field.
Philip Newton <philip.newton at gmail.com>
More information about the Ietf-languages