Reminder: Ulster Scots

[Doug Ewell]

> Hands up, everyone, ulster or 2006ulst and why.

I vote for 'ulster'.  It is functionally equivalent to '2006ulst' and
much, much less cryptic.  We can always register 'ulster15' if an
incompatibly different standard does emerge five years from now.

We also need to decide whether the intended scope is
dialect-plus-orthography or just orthography.

--
Doug Ewell  |  Thornton, Colorado, USA  |  http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14  |  ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s ­