Reminder: Ulster Scots
petercon at microsoft.com
Tue Mar 30 09:33:16 CEST 2010
The difference is that we know there weren't frequent updates at 2, 7, 4, 12... year intervals after the 1606 and 1694 publications. In the Ulster case, if another doc is published in 2012 with minor tweaks, are we going to register 2012ulst?
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 7:12 AM
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion
Subject: Re: Reminder: Ulster Scots
On 29 Mar 2010, at 14:15, Doug Ewell wrote:
> For French we were intentionally capturing two historical snapshots ("Late Middle French" and "Early Modern French") and used the publication dates 1606 and 1694 as historical references.
The publication dates of two specific texts. I don't see this as different from 2006ulst.
The tagging application here, for instance, is a text which is being translated into Ulster Scots, using this relatively new, standardized orthography.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
More information about the Ietf-languages