cewcathar at hotmail.com
Sun Jun 13 17:12:42 CEST 2010
Leif Halvard Silli xn--mlform-iua at xn--mlform-iua.no
Sat Jun 12 11:28:56 CEST 2010
> Doug Ewell, Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:13:07 -0600:
>> Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail dot com> wrote:
>>>> Option 1: Montenegrin continues to be represented by sr-ME.
>>> This option is not good as there are speakers of standard Serbian
>>> language in Montenegro. So, sr-ME should mean "Serbian spoken in
>>> Montenegro" as sr-Ba means "Serbian spoken in Bosnia and
>> Region subtags in BCP 47 identify the language variation typically
>> identified with that country or region, not the country in which the
>> speaker happens to be physically located. A person who speaks the
>> Serbian-standard dialect is speaking "sr-RS" regardless of whether he
>> or she lives in Serbia, Montenegro, or Bhutan.
> To which Milos Rancic, Sat, 12 Jun 2010 04:40:52 +0200 replied:
>> In relation to the written language, there are no national differences
>> between variants of Serbian language.
> [ snip to Milos' conclusion about the written language: ]
>> In other words, if it is so, then sr-BA and sr-ME, as well as hr-BA
>> and hr-ME, don't exist.
>> At the *spoken* level, there are dialect differences, but written
>> language is always the same. Besides that, there are no spoken
>> differences between Serbian and Montenegrin in, let's say, Podgorica.
> Doug: So, I am not sure there is any difference between you and Milos
> here. The way I perceived Milos, he emphasized that he talked about the
> spoken language. (Though I am also going to ask Milos a question - see
> Milos: So, when you said 'So, sr-ME should mean "Serbian spoken in
> Montenegro"', you meant 'So, sr-ME should mean "a Montenegrin dialect
> of the Serbian Language"'?
What Milos seems to be saying is that, in the case that the written versions of the language are being specified, the country/regional codes do not add information to the sr or hr subtags.
Is this correct?
This is all the additional information on Montenegrin that I can locate:
If a language subtag is not approved (and I am unsure at this point what I think -- though I do not disapprove of one -- as there are three supposedly different characters with different pronunciations),
then an alternate name for Serbian and the tag sr-ME -- as suggested -- would be o.k. for me too.
C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
> leif halvard silli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages