Missing subtags 003 and 172

[Kent Karlsson]

Den 2010-07-30 23.30, skrev "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>:

> The second
review period ended, Michael
> approved the four subtags as amended, and I
am planning to send him paperwork
> this weekend for forwarding to IANA. 
If you want to renew your objection, I
> suggest moving quickly.

I did object, see

http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/2010-July/010469.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/2010-July/010473.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/2010-July/010478.html

None of these were responded to (w.r.t. sa/san being Classical Sanskrit),
that I noticed anyway. I don't think "we" can interpret sa/san any wider
just for LSR. 

    /Kent K