Language Variant subtags for Sanskrit

[Phillips, Addison]

Most of the requests seem straightforward. Are we only talking about the subtag for "classical"? Using a native term to obfuscate "classical" would possibly be a good solution for that one subtag. There is no reason why a native term is required for the others. 

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect (Lab126)
Chair (W3C I18N, IETF IRI WGs)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-
> bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Doug Ewell
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:13 AM
> To: ietf-languages at iana.org
> Cc: peter_scharf at brown.edu
> Subject: Re: Language Variant subtags for Sanskrit
> 
> These requests for Sanskrit can't proceed until we have at least a
> bit
> of agreement on what the subtag values should be.
> 
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
> RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s ­
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages