Language Variant subtags for Sanskrit

Phillips, Addison addison at
Tue Jul 13 17:28:47 CEST 2010

Most of the requests seem straightforward. Are we only talking about the subtag for "classical"? Using a native term to obfuscate "classical" would possibly be a good solution for that one subtag. There is no reason why a native term is required for the others. 

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect (Lab126)
Chair (W3C I18N, IETF IRI WGs)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at [mailto:ietf-languages-
> bounces at] On Behalf Of Doug Ewell
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:13 AM
> To: ietf-languages at
> Cc: peter_scharf at
> Subject: Re: Language Variant subtags for Sanskrit
> These requests for Sanskrit can't proceed until we have at least a
> bit
> of agreement on what the subtag values should be.
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA |
> RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s ­
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list