ISO 639-3 changes, part 1

Michael Everson everson at
Sat Jan 30 08:22:15 CET 2010

On 30 Jan 2010, at 07:12, John Cowan wrote:

> Why can't these be sent to IANA by themselves as soon as the errors  
> are
> corrected and the time has expired?  I see no reason why all the  
> changes
> should be collected together before IANA gets any of them -- a  
> pipeline
> process seems more sensible to me.

I agree.

By the way, I have of course no formal view on any of these; the only  
question is whether Doug has transcribed and formatted correctly. Data- 
crunchers should do that verification. There are plenty of you on this  
list. ;-)

Michael Everson *

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list