Indonesian and extlang...
cowan at ccil.org
Fri Jan 1 02:46:27 CET 2010
Doug Ewell scripsit:
> In the (many times repeated) production of the RFC 5645 Registry,
> only newly created language subtags were considered as candidates
> for extlangs. Existing language subtags were not examined as part of
> this process.
Almost. Minangkabau is part of 639-2, and was added in 2005, but it
has an extlang tag. However, the case against ms-ind for me is that
Indonesian shouldn't be 'id' in one context and 'ind' in another.
Don't be so humble. You're not that great. John Cowan
--Golda Meir cowan at ccil.org
More information about the Ietf-languages