Last call: Latvian (and Bontok) extlang subtags
doug at ewellic.org
Mon Feb 8 04:05:19 CET 2010
Leif Halvard Silli <xn dash dash mlform dash iua at xn dash dash mlform
dash iua dot no> wrote:
> Technicality: I suppose the could be "promoted" to extlang status
> later on, if evidence surfaced that showed that it falls into at least
> one of the two categories you mentioned?
No. See RFC 5646, Section 3.4, item 12.C.4:
"'Extlang' records MUST NOT be created for items already in the
registry. Extended language subtags will only be considered at the time
of initial registration."
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s
More information about the Ietf-languages