Missing subtags 003 and 172
Mark Davis ☕
mark at macchiato.com
Sun Aug 1 06:03:46 CEST 2010
I'm glad we're ok on 003. As I said, I'll go back to the CLDR committee
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 20:26, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:
> I do not object to registering 003 according to Mark's proposal form, as
> long as it is generally agreed by the Reviewer and list membership that
> doing so is within the letter and spirit of RFC 5646.
> I do feel that both 003 and 021 should have a brief Comments field to
> describe the difference between them. Something on the order of "Comments:
> Includes Caribbean and Central America; see also 021" would be appropriate.
> A big long explanation is not necessary.
> I continue to object to 172 on the grounds that that code element is
> classified solely under the economic categories.
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
> RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages