Reminder: Ulster Scots
doug at ewellic.org
Fri Apr 2 14:28:50 CEST 2010
Kent Karlsson <kent dot karlsson14 at comhem dot se> wrote:
>> I don't see a need for a two-week extension; I agree with Mark and
>> Doug that the originally-proposed "ulster" does the job required.
> Still, the request needs to be amended as you accepted the suggestion
> that the tag would be for the Ulster dialect (for which there now is
> an "accepted norm" for the orthography).
> I would suggest:
>>Description: Ulster Scots orthography for Scots
> Description: Ulster dialect of Scots
>>This variant subtag is used to identify the Ulster Scots orthography.
> This variant subtag is used to identify the Ulster Scots dialect. For
> written content, this dialect now has an accepted orthography
> different from that used for other Scots dialects.
> (Or similar.)
I am in complete agreement with Kent here, if that is what the subtag is
intended to denote.
> According to the requirements of section 3.5 of RFC 5646 this
> amendment will require a one-week extension:
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s
More information about the Ietf-languages