doug at ewellic.org
Mon Sep 14 14:42:25 CEST 2009
"Lang Gérard" <gerard dot lang at insee dot fr> wrote:
> Yes, I think it would be useful to correct "nine" to "ten" inside line
> six of section 2.4 of RFC 5645.
Technically, it's not possible to change an RFC once it has been
published. You can file an erratum against the RFC, which is then
accessible along with the document from the RFC Editor site. See
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php for instructions. Or, if you like,
I will file it.
If the erratum mentions that "nine" should be "ten", then it should also
add a bullet-point paragraph for 'SU' similar to the existing one for
Please note, again, that this issue does not in any way affect the
contents of the Registry, nor the process by which it was constructed,
since 'SU' is already in the Registry.
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s
More information about the Ietf-languages