New record and form for 'Zinh' (was: Re: Last call for ISO 15924-based updates)

Phillips, Addison addison at
Sat Mar 21 18:56:20 CET 2009

> > FWIW, note that the 4646bis draft does allow the original
> requester
> > to modify the request without restarting the clock (there is
> still a
> > minimum one week time period before an updated record can be
> > approved; review periods are still in two week segments). We are
> not
> > under 4646bis now, of course.
> That, it seems, allows for more timely registrations.

It's why LTRU made the change.


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list