Zinh - Code for inherited script
mark at macchiato.com
Thu Feb 26 16:45:29 CET 2009
We decided long ago we would not cherrypick.
8. Codes assigned by ISO 639, ISO 15924, and ISO 3166 that do not
conflict with existing subtags of the associated type and whose
meaning is not the same as an existing subtag of the same type
are entered into the IANA registry as new records.
There is no use for zinh, but there is no use for many, many codes. That is
left up to guidance on usage.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 22:04, Tex Texin <textexin at xencraft.com> wrote:
> Well yes and no. If it doesn't support the purposes of BCP 47 why do it?
> In a string of say Cyrillic where these characters were used it would be a
> mistake to segment the string to tag individual characters with Zinh. (But
> people will do it.)
> If someone is writing code to process text, they don't need this either as
> they can use Unicode properties and/or their own internal labels.
> Why introduce labels for programming mechanisms that are not really needed
> for language tagging?
> Why add unnecessary complexity?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan at ccil.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 8:12 PM
> To: Tex Texin
> Cc: 'Randy Presuhn'; ietf-languages at iana.org
> Subject: Re: Zinh - Code for inherited script
> Tex Texin scripsit:
> > What is the point of having it at all?
> As I say, it's used to tag individual characters with a script. It serves
> no purpose in BCP 47.
> At the end of the Metatarsal Age, the dinosaurs John Cowan
> abruptly vanished. The theory that a single cowan at ccil.org
> catastrophic event may have been responsible
> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <http://www.ccil.org/%7Ecowan>
> has been strengthened by the recent discovery of
> a worldwide layer of whipped cream marking the
> Creosote-Tutelary boundary. --Science Made Stupid
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages