Variant subtag proposal: Hgnorsk variety of Norwegian
cowan at ccil.org
Tue Dec 29 23:41:15 CET 2009
Randy Presuhn scripsit:
> I think it depends on how well the tagger knows Norwegian.
> I don't know Norwegian, so if I were given a bunch of materials
> to tag and was only told that they were in Norwegian, I'd have
> to just say 'no', rather than making the 'nb'/'nn' distinction
> and probably getting it wrong.
Quite so. What is more, the nb/nn contrast properly applies only to
written Norwegian. The spoken language is a congeries of dialects,
of which some, the middle-class urban lects of southeastern Norway,
are reasonably close to written nb. Nn on the other hand is a sort
of abstract representation or artificial koine of the western dialects
(as they stood in the mid-19th century) as if they had descended from
Old Norse as a unified whole. As such, it is not even close to a
transcription of how anyone speaks, except on the podium, the stage,
the broadcasting studio, and suchlike places.
Therefore, when representing spoken Norwegian, one should normally use
'no', possibly with a variant tag for dialect.
How they ever reached any conclusion at all <cowan at ccil.org>
is starkly unknowable to the human mind. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
--"Backstage Lensman", Randall Garrett
More information about the Ietf-languages