Disposition of hepburn?
"Martin J. Dürst"
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Sat Dec 12 08:04:06 CET 2009
On 2009/12/12 8:30, John Cowan wrote:
> Frank Bennett scripsit:
>> I have posted for the deprecation of "heploc", but I am unsure what to
>> do with "hepburn". Were I to start the process again from scratch, I
>> would file for alalc97 only, and there would be no "hepburn" subtag.
>> However, "hepburn" potentially captures Japanese transliterations that
>> do not conform to the ALA-LC tables, so I am a little unsure of the
>> proper way forward.
> Hepburn is definitely wider than heploc/alalc97. I suggest a comment
> be added saying "See also alalc97", but otherwise left alone.
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
More information about the Ietf-languages