PROPOSAL: Remove Deprecation on "sh" in the IANA subtag registry
addison at amazon.com
Wed Aug 12 18:04:27 CEST 2009
ISO 639 isn’t going to resolve the issue because they don’t have one.
Regardless of whether it is deprecated or not, ‘sh’ is:
- a valid subtag
- a macrolanguage subtag
Politically ‘sh’ may be problematic, but no one is required to use it and we have ample primary language subtags to replace it. Since the registry does not permit multiple Preferred-Value fields, the most we could do is provide a Deprecated field. Mark is proposing to remove the Deprecated field since we don’t provide one for any other macrolanguage and since the RFC-to-be deprecates the use of macrolanguages in general. It isn’t like people tagging Serbian or Croatian are going to be confused, I think.
We can, of course, include a comment in the registry record explaining things in this special case. Perhaps:
Comment: For most modern uses, the subtags for languages enclosed by this macrolanguage
are usually preferred, cf. ‘sr’ (Serbian), ‘hr’ (Croatian), ‘bs’ (Bosnian).
Globalization Architect -- Lab126
Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.
From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of CE Whitehead
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 8:46 AM
To: ietf-languages at iana.org
Subject: PROPOSAL: Remove Deprecation on "sh" in the IANA subtag registry
Hi, I went and looked these arguments over and am a bit on the fence. Linguistically I believe that it is good to have a macrolanguage in this case but politically it may not be so. I won't at this time support a change, but will wait for a while to see if iso 639 ever resolves this issue.
C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com<mailto:cewcathar at hotmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ietf-languages