Pending business

[Doug Ewell]

I wrote:

> We have three outstanding registration requests, one for the "Academy" 
> romanization of Belarusian (as distinct from Taraskievica), one for 
> Pinyin (however that is defined), and one for Wade-Giles.

Regarding Belarusian, for "romanization" please read "Latin-script 
orthography."  I apologize for the error but trust everyone knew what I 
meant.

I got a private response:

> IIUC both Taraskievica and "Academy" are Cyrillic orthographies for 
> Belarusian, not Latin orthographies, thus not romanisations.

Actually these are Latin orthographies; the "standard" way of writing 
Belarusian is in Cyrillic.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ