Republic of Moldova
gerard.lang at insee.fr
Mon Oct 20 17:25:09 CEST 2008
If really RFC 4646 certainly encourages such changes, why not let this become mandatory inside RFC 4646 bis ?
De : Phillips, Addison [mailto:addison at amazon.com]
Envoyé : lundi 20 octobre 2008 17:20
À : Lang Gérard; Doug Ewell; ietf-languages at iana.org
Objet : RE: Republic of Moldova
> As such a change is mandatory for us, ISO 3166/MA will soon publish a
> 3166-1 Newsletter VI-4 about this change.
Actually, they're not.
RFC 4646 only requires us to track and deal with *new* code assignments by UN M.49 and ISO 3166-1.
It is a Good Thing to update the official name in the record and RFC 4646 certainly encourages such changes. But they are not part of the mandatory list of things that must be done. Note that anyone may request the update to the record using the registration process.
More information about the Ietf-languages