Modification request: gsw (new Description)
doug at ewellic.org
Fri Mar 21 16:23:02 CET 2008
Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> wrote:
> No, I have already sent them to IANA. They turned up in my mailbox
> before I saw your message here. I assumed you wanted me to act.
This would be my fault; I had forgotten about the relatively new
one-week waiting period for ISO-based changes, and had sent the forms to
Michael before writing to the list. I could have written back to
Michael and said "hold on, we have to wait 168 hours" but it was almost
11 pm and I chose not to.
Fortunately for me, there is no process failure here, because the
waiting period for ISO-based changes is not part of RFC 4646. It is
proposed as part of draft-4646bis, and we have been following it more or
less voluntarily in the meantime.
Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
More information about the Ietf-languages