ID for language-invariant strings
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Thu Mar 20 08:45:44 CET 2008
<Karen_Broome at spe.sony.com> wrote:
> it sounds like they will support the "not applicable" tag
> but that they think it should be a new tag.
SNAFU. Peter replied:
| the JAC is *not* discussing creation of a new tag; rather,
| they are discussing the addition of "not applicable" as an
| alternate term describing "zxx".
> I don't know who on this list actually gets to weigh in on
Apparently Peter (or John ?) killed "ork" and fixed "mis",
but couldn't do anything about "eur" after the fact.
More information about the Ietf-languages