ID for language-invariant strings

Frank Ellermann nobody at
Thu Mar 20 08:45:44 CET 2008

<Karen_Broome at> wrote:

> it sounds like they will support the "not applicable" tag
> but that they think it should be a new tag.

SNAFU.  Peter replied:

| the JAC is *not* discussing creation of a new tag; rather,
| they are discussing the addition of "not applicable" as an
| alternate term describing "zxx".


> I don't know who on this list actually gets to weigh in on
> 639-2.

Apparently Peter (or John ?) killed "ork" and fixed "mis",
but couldn't do anything about "eur" after the fact.  


More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list