ID for language-invariant strings
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Sat Mar 15 16:56:23 CET 2008
Peter Constable wrote:
> we should not fail to determine requirements and design
> appropriately just because parts of what engineering has
> been done up to now wasn't done so using good engineering
It is too late to come up with requirements for RFC 3066,
we can't get rid of the region subtags, and we can't add a
MUST NOT against generic variants. Some damage control is
> zxx versus und. Doesn't that suggest to anybody else here
> that just maybe those people don't agree because this is
> an instance of inappropriate overloading?
Yes, there should be only one tag "zxx", no "und", or v.v.
More information about the Ietf-languages